by Mahomet G Jones. 16p

In the document, the focus is on debunking false pedigrees, particularly those claiming royal lineage, due to their lack of authenticity. Ridford's book and other sources are cited for perpetuating obviously false pedigrees, highlighting the need for scrutiny and verification in genealogical research. By comparing these false pedigrees with Visitation pedigrees, discrepancies and inaccuracies are revealed, emphasizing the importance of thorough investigation and fact-checking in genealogical studies.

Speculations and conjectures regarding connections between different pedigrees are discussed, pointing out the complexities and challenges in tracing accurate lineage. The document underscores the necessity of critical analysis and cross-referencing to validate genealogical claims and avoid perpetuating false information. Through meticulous examination and comparison of various sources, researchers aim to uncover the truth behind lineage claims and correct any misconceptions or inaccuracies that may have been propagated over time.

The document sheds light on the meticulous process of disproving false pedigrees and the significance of historical accuracy in genealogical research. By scrutinizing and cross-referencing different sources, researchers strive to separate fact from fiction and provide a more reliable account of lineage and ancestry. This rigorous approach aims to rectify misconceptions and ensure that genealogical records are based on verifiable evidence rather than unsubstantiated claims.